> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://help.connected.illumina.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://help.connected.illumina.com/dragen-stratamap/dragen-spatial-transcriptome/outputs/results-folder/run-diagnostics.md).

# Quality Alerts

At the beginning of the DRAGEN report, Quality Alerts highlight metrics that differ significantly from expected values for healthy tissue and high-quality samples. Depending on your experimental design or sample specifics, these alerts may be safely ignored, or they may signal issues in the experiment or analysis.

### Quick Reference Table

<table><thead><tr><th width="271.199951171875">Metric</th><th width="458">Possible Causes</th><th data-hidden>NOTE Threshold</th><th data-hidden>WARNING Threshold</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>SBC Reads Mapping</strong></td><td>Small tissue slices, over-permeabilization, wrong Map file, incorrect images, or mismatched metadata</td><td>&#x3C;60%</td><td>&#x3C;10%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Payload Sequencing Quality</strong></td><td>Poor sequencing run quality</td><td>&#x3C;35</td><td>&#x3C;30</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reads Removed by Trimming</strong></td><td>Poor quality sample, poor library prep</td><td>>20%</td><td>>40%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>PolyA Trimming</strong></td><td>Poor quality sample</td><td>>20%</td><td>>50%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Quality Trimming</strong></td><td>Poor sequencing quality</td><td>>10%</td><td>>20%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Unique Alignments</strong></td><td>Poor quality sample, wrong genome reference</td><td>&#x3C;70%</td><td>&#x3C;40%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Reads Aligned to Genes</strong></td><td>Poor quality sample, wrong genome reference</td><td>&#x3C;70%</td><td>&#x3C;50%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>rRNA Percentage</strong></td><td>High ribosomal RNA content</td><td>>20%</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><strong>mtRNA Percentage</strong></td><td>High mitochondrial RNA content</td><td>>40%</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Cell Segmentation Probability</strong></td><td>Blurry or out-of-focus images, section thickness</td><td>&#x3C;75%</td><td>&#x3C;50%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Transcripts Inside Cells</strong></td><td>Poor registration, poor segmentation, high diffusion</td><td>&#x3C;50%</td><td>&#x3C;35%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>MT Filter Loss</strong></td><td>Default threshold not ideal for sample</td><td>>25%</td><td>>50%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>UMI Filter Loss</strong></td><td>Default threshold not ideal for sample</td><td>>25%</td><td>>50%</td></tr></tbody></table>

### Detailed Metric Descriptions

#### 1. SBC Reads Mapping (Run Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of sequencing reads that successfully map to Spatial Barcode (SBC) sequences.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: <60%
* WARNING: <10%

**What causes this alert:**

* **NOTE (<60%):** This can be due to small tissue slices, high diffusion from over-permeabilization, or other technical issues.
* **WARNING (<10%):** This can indicate the wrong Map file, incorrect images, or mismatched metadata were used for this analysis.

**What to do:**

* **NOTE:** Review your tissue section size and permeabilization protocol. Small tissue samples naturally have fewer reads mapping to SBCs. If over-permeabilization is suspected, adjust permeabilization time in future experiments.
* **WARNING:** Verify that the correct slideID, images, and sample metadata were used for this analysis run.

***

#### 2. Payload Sequencing Quality (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Mean quality score of the payload (insert) sequences after trimming.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: <35
* WARNING: <30

**What causes this alert:** This can indicate the sequencing run was poor quality. Check FastQC/MultiQC reports to examine sequencing quality further.

**What to do:**

* Review the FastQC and MultiQC reports included in your results.
* If WARNING, the data quality may be too poor for reliable analysis. Consider re-sequencing the library.
* If this affects multiple samples from the same sequencing run, there may have been an issue with the sequencer.

***

#### 3. Reads Removed by Trimming (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of reads that were completely removed during the trimming process.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >20%
* WARNING: >40%

**What causes this alert:** This can indicate a poor-quality sample and/or poor library preparation.

**What to do:**

* **NOTE:** Review your library preparation protocol for potential issues. The sample may still be usable, but with reduced data.
* **WARNING:** The high removal rate suggests significant quality issues. Review sample handling, storage, and library prep steps.
* Consider whether the sample was degraded prior to library preparation.

***

#### 4. PolyA Trimming (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of reads that required trimming of polyA tails.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >20%
* WARNING: >50%

**What causes this alert:** This can indicate a poor-quality sample.

**What to do:**

* High polyA content may indicate RNA degradation.
* Review sample collection, storage, and handling procedures.
* Evaluate RNA integrity if available (RIN scores).

***

#### 5. Quality Trimming (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of reads that required trimming due to low base quality scores.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >10%
* WARNING: >20%

**What causes this alert:** This can indicate poor sequencing quality.

**What to do:**

* Review sequencing metrics and quality reports.
* If multiple samples show this alert, there may have been a sequencer issue.
* Check for any noted issues during the sequencing run.

***

#### 6. Unique Alignments (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of reads that align uniquely to a single location in the genome.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: <70%
* WARNING: <40%

**What causes this alert:**

* **NOTE (<70%):** This can indicate a poor-quality sample.
* **WARNING (<40%):** This can indicate that the wrong genome reference was used for the analysis.

**What to do:**

* **NOTE:** Review sample quality metrics. Lower unique alignment rates can occur with degraded samples or high levels of ribosomal or mitochondrial RNA.
* **WARNING:** First, verify that the correct genome reference (species and version) was selected for the analysis. If incorrect, re-run the analysis with the correct reference.

***

#### 7. Reads Aligned to Genes (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of mapped reads (including multimapped reads when enabled) that align to annotated gene regions.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: <70%
* WARNING: <50%

**What causes this alert:**

* **NOTE (<70%):** This can indicate a poor-quality sample.
* **WARNING (<50%):** This can indicate that the wrong genome reference was used for the analysis.

**What to do:**

* **NOTE:** Low gene alignment can result from degraded RNA or high levels of non-coding RNA. Review other quality metrics.
* **WARNING:** Verify that the correct genome reference and gene annotation were used for the analysis.

***

#### 8. rRNA Percentage (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of UMIs (unique molecular identifiers) that correspond to ribosomal RNA.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >20%
* No WARNING threshold

**What causes this alert:** This sample has a high level of rRNA. This may be expected based on the specific sample or could merit further investigation.

**What to do:**

* High rRNA content is common in many sample types and may not indicate a problem.
* This is primarily informational; evaluate based on your specific experimental design and sample type.

***

#### 9. mtRNA Percentage (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of UMIs that correspond to mitochondrial RNA.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >40%
* No WARNING threshold

**What causes this alert:** This sample has a high level of mtRNA. This may be expected based on the specific sample or could merit further investigation.

**What to do:**

* High mitochondrial RNA content is expected in certain tissue types (heart, muscle, kidney, liver, brain).
* It can also indicate cellular stress or dying/damaged cells.
* This is primarily informational; consider your biological context.
* If unexpected for your tissue type, it may warrant investigation into sample handling.

***

#### 10. Cell Segmentation Probability (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Median probability score from the cell segmentation algorithm, indicating confidence in cell boundary detection.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: <75%
* WARNING: <50%

**What causes this alert:** This can indicate blurry or out-of-focus images, and/or may be related to the thickness of the section.

**What to do:**

* Review the original microscopy images for focus and clarity.
* Check if imaging conditions were optimal.
* Evaluate whether section thickness may be affecting image quality.
* If images are poor quality, consider whether re-imaging is possible and necessary for your analysis.
* Poor segmentation will reduce the accuracy of cell-level analysis.
* For WARNING alerts, cell boundaries may be unreliable; consider using bin-based analysis instead if available.

***

#### 11. Transcripts Inside Cells (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of detected transcripts that fall within segmented cell boundaries.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: <50%
* WARNING: <35%

**What causes this alert:** This can indicate poor registration or poor cell segmentation and/or high diffusion.

**What to do:**

* Check the quality of image registration (alignment between imaging and sequencing data).
* Review cell segmentation quality (see Cell Segmentation Probability above).
* Evaluate whether over-permeabilization may have caused transcript diffusion outside cells.
* Low values will affect the accuracy of cell-level gene expression profiles.
* Review tissue handling and permeabilization protocols for future experiments.

***

#### 12. MT Filter Loss (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of cells or bins that were filtered out during clustering due to high mitochondrial RNA content.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >25%
* WARNING: >50%

**What causes this alert:**

* **NOTE (>25%):** A high percentage of cells were filtered out during clustering because of high mtRNA. The default threshold may not be ideal for your sample.
* **WARNING (>50%):** A very high percentage of cells were filtered out during clustering because of high mtRNA. The default threshold may not be ideal for your sample.

**What to do:**

* This alert indicates that the default MT filtering threshold (used to remove low-quality cells) may be too stringent for your sample type.
* High MT content is normal for certain tissues (heart, muscle, kidney, liver, brain).
* Consider adjusting the MT filtering threshold in your analysis parameters using analysis\_config.json or directly in ICM.

***

#### 13. UMI Filter Loss (Sample Level)

**What it measures:** Percentage of cells or bins that were filtered out during clustering due to low UMI (molecule) counts.

**Thresholds:**

* NOTE: >25%
* WARNING: >50%

**What causes this alert:**

* **NOTE (>25%):** A high percentage of cells were filtered out during clustering because of low molecule counts. The default threshold may not be ideal for your sample.
* **WARNING (>50%):** A very high percentage of cells were filtered out during clustering because of low molecule counts. The default threshold may not be ideal for your sample.

**What to do:**

* This alert indicates that the default UMI filtering threshold (used to remove low-quality cells and bins) may not be optimal for your sample.
* Consider whether your sample naturally has lower transcript counts (for example, certain cell types or small cells).
* Evaluate adjusting the UMI filtering threshold in your analysis parameters using analysis\_config.json or directly in ICM.

***

### Understanding Alert Levels

#### NOTE

Indicates metrics outside the typical range for high-quality samples. These may be acceptable depending on your experimental design and sample characteristics. Review the specific alert and consider your biological context.

#### WARNING

Indicates metrics severely outside expected ranges, often suggesting technical issues, incorrect analysis parameters, or very poor sample quality. These generally require action such as verifying analysis parameters, reviewing sample quality, or potentially re-running parts of the analysis.

***

*Note: Threshold values and messages in this guide are current as of April 30, 2026. Default thresholds may be updated based on ongoing data analysis and customer feedback.*


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://help.connected.illumina.com/dragen-stratamap/dragen-spatial-transcriptome/outputs/results-folder/run-diagnostics.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
