For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Review Image QC

The Review image QC screen is the fourth step in the image processing workflow. It displays quality results and allows visual inspection of the images to determine whether to proceed or retake images.

The Image QC step evaluates uploaded images against quality and registration standards to ensure accuracy and consistency in downstream analyses.

During this process:

  • Images are registered to a standard coordinate system with a resolution of 1 μm/pixel.

  • Each image is transformed into an upright position aligned with the slide, based on detected fiducial markers.

  • A QC status is reported, categorizing image quality and highlighting any issues that may impact analysis.

This evaluation helps identify problems early, reducing the risk of errors in subsequent steps.

Confirm your image(s) pass QC before processing the samples in the assay. This allows for re-imaging if they fail registration or are not of sufficient quality. To save time, upload your stitched images into ISIT and go through the image QC step. If they pass QC, continue with the assay and return to ISIT later to complete the rest of the process through OME-TIFF export.

Filter Tabs

The filter tabs at the top of the samples list allow filtering by QC status:

Tab
Description

All

Displays all samples.

Passed

Displays samples that passed all QC checks.

Failed registration

Displays samples that failed image registration.

Quality issues

Displays samples with image quality concerns.

QC Categories

When a sample is expanded, detailed QC results are displayed for each category:

Registration

Indicates whether the image was correctly registered. Click the information icon for more details about registration.

The number and placement of fiducial markers in the QC sample image can differ between samples. Some images may show a dense grid of markers in the surrounding white area, while others may have markers mainly along the tissue edges. This variation is normal and does not indicate any error in image registration or QC status.

Blur

An in-focus image is ideal for downstream analysis, such as cell segmentation.

If a Blur Information Signal appears during Image QC, click it to display the blur heat map on the sample image:

  • Blue areas indicate relatively low blur

  • Red areas indicate relatively high blur

You can proceed if blur is detected, but visually inspect image quality first. If the image appears significantly blurred and individual cells and nuclei are not visible, consider retaking the image before proceeding.

Blur Warning and Blur Heat Map

An in-focus image is ideal for downstream analysis, such as cell segmentation.

If you receive a blur warning during the Image QC step and click on it, the system displays a blur heat map:

  • Blue indicates areas of relatively low blur

  • Red indicates areas of relatively high blur

While you can continue the workflow even if a blur warning appears, it is recommended to inspect the image quality first. If the image looks significantly blurred and individual cells are not visible, consider retaking the image before proceeding.

Quality Assessment

While the software provides automated QC results, manual visual inspection is recommended. When reviewing images:

  1. Zoom into the image to inspect detail.

  2. Verify that nuclei are clearly visible.

  3. Check for areas of blur or poor focus.

  4. Use the Blur Heatmap to identify problem regions.

The software QC results should be used as a tool to assist evaluation, not as the sole basis for determining image quality.

Last updated

Was this helpful?