Commercial Control Use with TSO 500 ctDNA

The page aggregates materials to help plan analytical studies with commercial controls for TruSight Oncology ctDNA v2 assay.

Best Practices

  • Use commercial controls only for the variant class they are intended for. For example, if the sample is contrived for CNVs but not explicitly for SNV, or fusions, we would not recommend using this sample for validation or as a positive control for SNV or fusions.

  • Plan the studies taking into account that the actual VAFs in the control do not match exactly the targeted VAFs and can vary from lot to lot based on the manufacture’s process for creating the controls. The recall could be lower for variants with VAF below the assay’s LOD. Include dilutions above LOD, at LOD, and below LOD.

VAF in Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix

Factors that impact variant VAF in Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix products:

  • The mutation mix products are formulated so that the target VAFs fall within a specified range as measured by dPCR; for example, the Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix AF0.5% includes variants with dPCR‑measured VAFs between approximately 0.400% and 0.625%. For certain variant classes - such as indels and fusions - a VAF near 0.4% is below the LOD for TSO 500 ctDNA v2, which may result in less consistent detection.

  • VAFs are measured by dPCR before DNA fragmentation. Subsequent fragmentation can alter the observed VAF.

  • Technical reports, see example, provide VAFs determined by the Archer® Reveal ctDNA™ 28 kit. VAFs measured by dPCR can differ from VAFs determined by NGS, as well as change after fragmentation In addition, VAFs are assay‑dependent, and VAFs observed using the TSO 500 ctDNA v2 assay may differ from those determined using the Archer® Reveal ctDNA™ 28 assay.

  • Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix products may show some batch‑to‑batch variation in individual variant VAFs while still meeting quality control specifications established by dPCR. Illumina aggregates customer reports regarding variants that are not detected due to lower‑than‑expected VAFs in certain batches and can provide additional information upon request.

The newly released next‑generation Seraseq® ctDNA v4 Reference Materials offer several advantages for TSO 500 ctDNA studies:

  • The VAF is determined using TSO 500 ctDNA instead of the Archer® Reveal ctDNA™ 28 assay. See example of Certificate of Analysis for Seraseq® ctDNA Mutation Mix v4 AF0.5%.

  • Improved fragmentation process to lower background noise >10x compared to Seraseq ctDNA Complete products

  • Expanded number of variants including SNVs, deletions, insertions, INDELs, CNVs, and translocations for the broader coverage.

MSI testing

When designing analytical performance studies for MSI (also referred to as bMSI), Illumina recommends using as a truth set MSI status for real cancer samples or cell lines, established using an orthogonal method, for example, PCR or tissue NGS. Using contrived reference samples with limited number of microsatellite sites is not recommended due to the design of the MSI algorithm, specifically, the use of > 2,300 microsatellite sites with 6-7 bp size. See MSI algorithm page for more details.

Performance for Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix 0.5%AF

The table below summarizes the variant calling results by the TSO 500 ctDNA v2 assay for Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix AF0.5% (Material Number 0710-0531, Lot 10624818) across 9 customer sites that participated in the early access program. The call rate, and the average observed VAF, depth and read counts are generated across 9 sites and 19 replicates.

Gene
AA Change
Variant type
Call Rate
Expected VAF, %*
Observed VAF, %
Observed Depth
# Variant Allele Reads

AKT1

p.E17K

SNV

100%

0.51

0.32 ± 0.09

5424 ± 1745

17 ± 6

ALK

p.F1174L

SNV

100%

0.54

0.57 ± 0.12

3115 ± 832

18 ± 6

ALK

p.G1202R

SNV

100%

0.48

0.45 ± 0.12

2774 ± 792

12 ± 4

BRAF

p.V600E

SNV

100%

0.46

0.5 ± 0.14

4405 ± 1294

22 ± 7

BRCA1

p.K654fs*47

Del

58%

0.46

0.5 ± 0.09

4018 ± 1254

20 ± 7

BRCA2

p.R2645fs*3

Del

100%

0.59

0.57 ± 0.11

4400 ± 1383

25 ± 7

EGFR

p.E746_A750 del ELREA

Del

100%

0.64

0.51 ± 0.14

2663 ± 628

14 ± 5

EGFR

p.L747_P753>S

Del

100%

0.50

0.51 ± 0.12

2649 ± 563

14 ± 5

EGFR

p.L858R

SNV

100%

0.53

0.49 ± 0.16

3605 ± 983

18 ± 8

EGFR

p.S752_I759 del SPKANKEI

Del

100%

0.50

0.54 ± 0.1

3932 ± 1257

22 ± 9

EGFR

p.T790M

SNV

100%

0.42

0.48 ± 0.12

4558 ± 1347

22 ± 7

ERBB2

p.A775_G776 ins YVMA

Ins

100%

0.56

0.53 ± 0.15

4043 ± 1284

22 ± 9

KIT

p.D816V

SNV

100%

0.56

0.46 ± 0.12

3717 ± 1205

17 ± 7

KRAS

p.G12C

SNV

100%

0.54

0.5 ± 0.13

2920 ± 604

15 ± 5

KRAS

p.G12D

SNV

100%

0.55

0.68 ± 0.18

2201 ± 513

15 ± 5

KRAS

p.Q61H

SNV

100%

0.55

0.4 ± 0.12

3401 ± 975

14 ± 6

NRAS

p.Q61R

SNV

100%

0.56

0.37 ± 0.11

4953 ± 1514

18 ± 7

PIK3CA

p.H1047R

SNV

100%

0.56

0.49 ± 0.12

4448 ± 1399

21 ± 6

PIK3CA

p.N1068fs*4

Ins

97%

0.52

0.49 ± 0.14

3108 ± 766

15 ± 5

ERBB2

Amplification

100%

2.56 copies or 1.28 FC

1.31 ± 0.01 (FC)

MET

Amplification

100%

2.41 copies or 1.21 FC

1.41 ± 0.02 (FC)

MYC

Amplification

92%

2.37 copies or 1.19 FC

1.2 ± 0.01 (FC)

CD74-ROS1

Translocation

89%

0.53

0.41 ± 0.16

4291 ± 1153

18 ± 8

EML4-ALK

Translocation

100%

0.49

0.34 ± 0.12

4261 ± 1070

14 ± 5

NCOA4-RET

Translocation

83%

0.56

0.22 ± 0.07

3740 ± 1034

8 ± 3

*Expected VAF (%) provided as detected by dPCR for Seraseq ctDNA Complete Mutation Mix AF0.5% (MN 0710-0531, lot 10624818), Technical Report.

Last updated

Was this helpful?